Should BJP discard Ram Temple issue tactfully to protect NDA?
It is only BJP which possesses comparatively better qualities in larger number of its leaders. There are black sheep in all political parties, but BJP has very few. It is also true BJP has suffered erosion in its image due to much rhetoric on Ayodhya issue, its over dependence on construction of Ram temple and due to its image tarnished by media campaign and other political parties called as secular.
When the party was in rule they forgot this agenda and whenever election comes near, this party under pressure of some hard core leaders as also leaders of Bajrang Dal, RSS and VHP is constrained to adopt the same old agenda by which public in general is fed up.
It is worthwhile to mention here that during its last rule in the country, the party gained best image under the leadership of Atal Vihari Vajpayee and L K Advani and India was really shining. But the word shining was ridiculed by the then opposition parties taking support of disgruntled leaders, greedy leaders and childish behavior of leaders of BJP supporting groups named above.
BJP inspite of giving good governance and solid execution of its development agenda lost the image on the eve of last election when leaders of Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Bajrang Dal and RSS started criticizing softness and balanced policy of BJP and when BJP’s own friends tarnished the image of veteran leader like L K Advani , and all such criticism under jealousy and with greed in mind to gain some prestigious post which BJP alone used to enjoy due to their entry in Government.
Again on 7th of this month Mr. Rajnath Singh stressed that BJP will construct Ram temple at Ayodhya and reignited the issue giving opposing parties same tool to tarnish the secular image of BJP built by Mr. Advani through his strategic silence on the issue for last almost one decade. I reiterate here that voters in general do not like communal disturbance and more pin pointedly the mischievous and uncivilized campaign by person like Togaria ,Katiyar and all five Kauravs of Vishwa Hindu Parishad who while praising Hindus do not hesitate to hurt the sentiments of Muslims while delivering election speeches during poll rallies?
As such it is desirable that BJP discard temple issue tactfully and at least do not put any more stress on Temple issue and concentrate only on the achievements of BJP in BJP ruled states and occasionally on the faults committed by ruling UPA. It is undeniable fact that the issue of temple will prove to be counter productive.
It is to be kept in mind that Ms Uma Bharti , the hard core supporter of Ram temple lost miserably in MP .. .Mr. Kalyan Singh lost the ground when he left BJP last time. Again this time Mr. Kalyan Singh has left BJP due to some ego clash with Rajnath Singh and he will be able to do nothing at his own and this is why he also thought it fit to discard the Ram Mandir issue to remain alive in politics in association with Mulayam Singh Yadav. These two snakes will slowly pollute the air which will go against the prospect of BJP.
BJP can use the issue of terror attack and failure of UPA in handling this grave issue as Obama did in a few days of rule and as Bush did during his rule by not allowing recurrence of terror attack after 2001.Voters in genral are not happy with the paper bullet threatening given to Pakistan by Pranab Mukherjee and his friends in Congress Party
BJP can publicize the corruption perpetuated by Congress in NREGA and in all schemes sponsored by government. BJP can use drama on Nuclear issue if found beneficial. BJP can use sky rocketing prices of all essential commodities including Gold, sharp fall in stock market causing huge loss to retail investors, government failure in providing leak proof solid governance in corporate sector which gave rise to perpetuation of fraud of such huge dimension in Satyam.
BJP can loudly say that during UPA rule and due to faulty policies of economic liberalization and globalization assets of 5 percent of businessmen grew disproportionately widening the gap between the riches and the poor. Social crime has grown by leaps and bounds due to increasing unemployment whereas BJP ruled state Gujarat has created history in development of Gujarat and creating an atmosphere conducive for industrialization and creation of fresher employment opportunities.
There are several positive points in the almirah of BJP for use during election campaign which will prove more fruitful and less damager than temple issue which may produce more side effects enough to destroy the future of BJP winning probabilities. On the contrary Congress has nothing as such which can be used as positive points to lure the voters. Congress in particular and UPA in general and parties like SP and BSP have the one and only agenda of secularism and this is why they invariably create bad name for BJP by pointing its communal agenda.
If one is good one should appear to be good. If BJP wants to appear as good party meant f
vajpayee, rajnath singh,brajesh mishra ,kalyan singh etc., are the thorns in BJP and they want to protect the interests of nehru congress than BJP; they argue that Advani, having been born in present pakistan, becomes a foreigner; thats why they work rather for the defeat of BJP.
Modi is also keepng a distance from these people because they always try to bring down the BJP.
The Indian psyche has to develop & mature to a point to maintain its individual identity and insulate constitutionally of western interests in
its well being and focus on its own well being FIRST and everything
in its larger interests as a SECOND priority,means it should provision
AID (= resources) to its own UNDERDEVELOPED population before providing AID and such resource support to populations outside of its political precincts. OBJECTIVITY in Political agendas should be the decisive factor understanding that RELIGION is commingled in the ECONOMIC well being of individuals (RELIGION IS MODERN ECONOMICS), rather than exploitation of vested interests with out
side influences, etc. [*] The energy consumed by a human body ? = 100Wats [*] The Avg. daily food intake of an adult person is 2000Kcal. What is the equivalent in KWh ? = 2000 Kcal is approximately 2 kWh.[*] According to, an average UK lifestyle requires 5.29 ha/capita. If everybody lived today like a UK citizen, we would need 2.7 planets.
BUT THEN WHAT IS THE PER CAPITA CONSUMPTION OF A TYPICAL INDIAN ? POLITICAL AGENDA & ITS REPRESENTATIVES SHOULD HAVE A MOTIVE IN THE LARGER CONTEXT & FOCUS ON ESSENTIALS & NOT GET PRE-OCCUPIED WITH EXPLOITATION OF ITS POPULATION BY VIRTUE OF HOLDING OFFICE TO ENRICH THEMSELVES, WHICH IS BECOMING THE PRIMARY MOTIVE FOR CONTENDING FOR OFFICE ACROSS & WASTAGE OF RESOURCES IN INTRA-NATIONAL POLITICAL RIVALRY.
I don’t think that either the BJP or its allies are capable of doing anything other than divide and rule.
Look at Karnataka, the peace of the south is spoiled.
None should run for temple of Raja Ram.
. politics should not be mixed with religion.who ever brings religion in politics that party should be banned.all the fools making tall speeches should read the constitution very cleraly and then asend the stage. india is not a country it isan union of states and whenr I don’t like to remain in the union I shall walk out and allthe statesare shortly going to do as is seen from the growing of regionalism.if youw ant acountry like india to be united it only by pressure or else this country can never kept united .isted of worrying about unifying the nation advani is worried about rama and lakshmana.the peole in north should knoe how to coexists with people of other religion . if they think hindi is the only language and Rama is the only god you are agin going to lead the country to slavery.
Of course! Ur presentation is good.case of INC v/s BJP is not unknown now.Congress is busy to get it understand to the non hindus that bjp ‘ll crush them-particularly to the illiterate mass.Aware people know that it doesn’t going to happen.Work culture should be highlighted.
The pulse of BJP is grossly misunderstood. Just as Sardar Patel vowed to rebuild the Somnath temple after Independence, there are lot of pious Hindus who want to build the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. If BJP will not fulfill it who else would..?
But I doubt if the BJP would stir the hornet’s nest by building in the disputed site.. which is sure to be taken advantage of to stir communal passion by the “secularists” defending the rights of the minorities to prevail over the majority in every way regardless of merits.. In fact, the sincere muslims would not protest, but the pseudo secularists would make it a big issue and have the fundamentalist outfits create problems for the govt..
So I hope BJP would fulfill the desire of the majority in an amicable way.. The contention that the BJP’s declaration itself would be a weak point is debatable. Only the dubious congress and its equally unprincipled allies would shout but the people would not find it offensive..
IF for diplomatic reasons the BJP does play down the point, it would indeed be good - to disarm the enemies of Hindus.. Let us see how its leaders respond.